Criminal defense attorney Randy Zelin tells CNN there is reasonable doubt “everywhere” in the New York vs. Donald Trump “hush money” trial:
RANDY ZELIN, CNN: They fell way short, because let’s start with reasonable doubt. What is reasonable doubt? And it’s not simply a doubt based upon reason. Anytime a human being needs to make an important decision in life, if you have enough information. For example, a doctor says you need open heart surgery. Doc, go ahead and schedule. I don’t have a reasonable doubt.
Conversely, if I say I appreciate it, but I need a second opinion, I need more information, that is having a reasonable doubt. There is reasonable doubt all over this case. Where is Keith Schiller? Where is Allen Weisselberg? How did Michael Cohen get away with stealing $30,000? Hold a pity party for him, made $4 million on this thought he’d be chief of staff. He’s a fixer. If the plumber comes to my house to fix my leak, I could be home. That doesn’t mean I know how he’s doing it, and what it’s taking to be fixed. Stormy Daniels, let’s hold a pity party for her.
Why do we need to know whether or not the former president wore a condom or not?
It’s simply about did the former president know that books, his records , false entries, for legal fees?
Michael Cohen was his lawyer, did he intend to cover up the election or to protect his family? It’s everywhere!
